Are we supposed to care about children or not?

I would like to hear an answer to this question: Do the rights of women to decide on the birth of their children supersede the rights of U.S. citizens to own guns? Or to put it in Piers Morgan’s words, does the “right of a child not to be blown away” also imply a child’s right not to have its spinal cord severed with scissors as part of a late-term abortion procedure? I’ll get back to that in a second.

Morgan’s charge is nonsense. Of course children—and all people—have a right not to be murdered. We have homicide laws for that very reason. He uses this to suggest that people should not have guns, or at least certain arbitrary categories of guns. This same logic would say that prohibition should be reinstated because people have a right not to be a victim of drunk driving. For that matter, we should ban cars, which killed over 32,000 people in 2011.

The media has been all over this gun issue, to the point of suggesting that photos of the dead Sandy Hook victims should be released in order to stir the nation to tighten gun regulations. But when it comes to the equally disturbing practice of abortion, there is no talk of releasing photos, or even discussing the victims of people like Dr. Kermit Gosnell, who gets paid to “flip the body of the baby over and snip its neck with a pair of scissors to ensure ‘fetal demise.'”

Conservative blog site HotAir has a good take on the story here.

Gosnell is facing a minimum 20 years in prison, and possibly the death penalty. That’s the good news, because his estimated 100 victims did have a right to life—regardless of the parent—and he took it. The bad news is that the media has brushed the story under the rug. If you’ve heard of it before now, it was likely from a conservative source.

The tacit message from those in the media, who are overwhelmingly liberal, is that either the public already agrees with their skewed views of justice, or certain injustices are not worth discussing because they harm the agenda. Likely, it’s both. They believe that the majority is behind them, and certain types of injustice warrant discussion because they fuel the fire of “progress” against those cantankerous old world conservatives.

We are supposed to take immediate action against second amendment liberties because we care about children, but at the same time ignore the infanticide happening right in front of us in the name of individual liberty. There is neither logical nor moral consistency in this argument, unless the goal is not really justice, but ideology.

This shouldn’t be a political issue—indeed, the video below shows that many see this as a form of intentional racial oppression, though I would disagree with that characterization. That blacks are the overwhelming majority of abortion victims is a matter less of design than the realities of extremely high pregnancy rates among blacks. This 20-minute video, produced by the 3801 Lancaster Project, tells the story up to the point of Gosnell’s arrest. The trial has been going for months, with many gruesome new details surfacing. And though clinics like this are operating all over the country, all the media wants to talk about is Sandy Hook and guns.

1 Comment

  1. While some exaggeration of her views and beliefs has occurred in the conservative media and some minimization in the progressive media, Margaret Sanger founded Planned Parenthood and was a proponent of abortion. She was also a eugenicist and held that the “inferior and unfit” be either segregated or sterilized “for the benefit of the race”.

    But to the point, Gosnell’s acts described in the article are illegal in most States. Late-term abortion is a crime in those States.

    Gosnell’s prosecution surprises me in two ways:
    1. That liberal courts would proceed with such a case; and,
    2. That I have not heard a word about it before this article.

    I would hope that he receives the maximum sentence of death but that it not be by lethal injection. It should be by scissors.

    That a woman would allow such a procedure SHOULD make her at least an accessory before the fact and subject to the same penalties as the perpetrator.

    More specifically, Piers Morgan is a carbon footprint I would approve reducing. Each word he utters contributes to the atmospheric CO2 load.

    The question posed is similar to “have you stopped beating your wife?”.
    The act of infanticide by a doctor who swore an oath to “First do no harm” is premeditated murder.

    The act of a mass shooting (or mass knifing as happened in Texas yesterday) is premedited murder. This is proven by the preparations for the act.

    The difference is that the former is coldly calculated murder by an educated man given the right to practice his profession by the State.

    The latter is most often the act of a mentally ill person. Not a legally insane person, but mentally ill. The perpetrators on both cases should be executed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s